🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.